e-CareManagement blog

Chronic Disease Management • Technology • Strategy • Issues and Trends

Blueprint for Change: From EMR 1.0 to Clinical Groupware (EHR 2.0)

by Vince Kuraitis JD, MBA and David C. Kibbe MD, MBA

The last article in this series — Time for EHRs to Become Plug-and-Play — used words to describe a major industry shift underway in health IT.

Sometimes pictures help to make a point. Here are several diagrams that you can also download as PowerPoint slides.

 Computer Industry 1983 to 2002

Computer83

 Computer02

  Source: Venkatraman, N. Winning in a Network Centric Era, 2006

Blueprint for Health IT Shift

From EMR 1.0 — 2008…

EMR1.0

…to Clinical Groupware/EHR 2.0 — 2012

CGW

Download these slides in PowerPoint format here.  We welcome your comments.

Tags: , , ,
 

Discussion

What do you think? Leave a comment. Alternatively, write a post on your own weblog; this blog accepts trackbacks. Your "first time" comment will not appear until approved by the moderator. Comments are closed after a post is 90 days old.

Subscribe without commenting

Comments

1.
On June 24th, 2009 at 8:32 am, James Maldonado said:

Gentleman,

Thanks for a succinct visual summary of Clay Christensen’s ideas as applied to mainstream EHR vendor offerings.

Alas, we who have been in the IT industry for awhile have seen this before. The dominant ERP vendors, SAP first and foremost, peddled bloated, exorbitantly priced, monolithic software for a couple of decades despite their egregious project failure rates and outrageous cost. Sound familiar?

The Internet exposed the failings of this approach for collaborative commerce (like your clinical groupware) when customers veered away from these vendors for supply and distribution chain solutions.

I think you have left one major layer off of your 1983 and 2002 computer industry slides. The missing layer is the database layer. A primary reason for the now needless complexity of SAP and the major EHR offerings is the approach taken to data persistence.

Mike Stonebraker, who along with Ted Codd invented the relational database, has written recently that it is time for a re-write of what is now 30 year old database technology. This market is breaking up a la Christensen into several distinct markets–warehousing, streams processing, xml stores, Google GData, tranaction processing, etc. When you change the persistence model you change the software architecture profoundly.

Take a look at WorkDay founded by PeopleSoft founder Dave Duffield. WorkDay is what happens when when you give a clean sheet of paper to engineers who have survived the ERP death march. Workday is also notable for the resource, event, agent (REA) accounting framework that it uses. REA could be very valuable as a better way to conceptualize the interface between clinical encounters and billable events–a big problem.

It is time for a re-write of the outdated architectural assumptions underlying the current vendor offerings. We have already been there and done that in other industries. It is time to look forward in software architecture to the health care informatics challenges of the future–collaborative care, ontologies, semantic web, and personalized medicine to name a few.

Keep up the good work.

Mentions on other sites...

  1. zorgbeheer on June 21st, 2009 at 11:03 pm
  2. arthurwlane on June 30th, 2009 at 7:32 am
  3. arthurwlane on July 2nd, 2009 at 7:19 am
  4. arthurwlane on September 24th, 2009 at 12:01 pm
  5. arthurwlane on September 24th, 2009 at 12:03 pm