Subscribe if you want to be notified of new blog posts. You will receive an email confirming your subscription.

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.

Please check the captcha to verify you are not a robot.

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.

Pilots, Demonstrations & Innovation in the PPACA Healthcare Reform Legislation

Here’s a bit of trivia that will make you the hit of the next cocktail party you attend.  How many times are the words “demonstration” and “pilot” mentioned in the newly passed Federal healthcare reform legislation — the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)?

Answer:

  • “demonstration” — 312 mentions
  • “pilot” — 80 mentions

This weekend I’ve been trying to wrap my head around the question “Just what are these demos and pilots in the PPACA all about?” I have been boggled by the sheer number and complexity, and thought I’d share some findings from my first dive.

Why are These Pilots and Demonstrations Important?

One of the most frequently voiced criticisms of the PPACA is that it doesn’t do enough about controlling costs through delivery system reform. I’d agree that this is the biggest flaw in the legislation.

That said, the pilots, demonstrations, and the creation of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMI) are the best efforts in the PPACA to control future costs.  Whether they will work deserves further scrutiny, but today I’d just like to list and briefly describe these initiatives.

Keep in mind the distinctions between pilot and demonstration projects. In short, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) will have the authority to expand pilot programs and put them into practice without requiring Congressional approval.

 

What are the Pilots and Demonstrations in the PPACA?

I count at least 5 pilot projects and 30 demos in the PPACA legislation.

Here are some of the pilots and demos that I believe will be of most interest to e-CareManagement readers. (A full listing of pilots & demos is shown at the bottom of the post).

Pilots

Sec. 3023. National pilot program on payment bundling
Sec. 4202. Healthy aging, living well; evaluation of community-based prevention and wellness programs for Medicare beneficiaries
Sec. 4206. Demonstration project concerning individualized wellness plan
Sec. 10326. Pilot testing pay-for-performance programs for certain Medicare providers

Demos

Sec. 2704. Demonstration project to evaluate integrated care around a hospitalization
Sec. 2705. Medicaid global payment system demonstration project
Sec. 2706. Pediatric Accountable Care Organization demonstration project
Sec. 3024. Independence at home demonstration program
Sec. 3027. Extension of gainsharing demonstration
Sec. 2601. 5-year period for demonstration projects. (for dual eligible beneficiaries)
Sec. 3140. Medicare hospice concurrent care demonstration program.
Sec. 3510. Patient navigator program.
Sec. 4206. Demonstration project concerning individualized wellness plan.

 

What’s The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMI)

Section 3021 of the enabling legislation also establishes the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation within CMS. According to the Democratic Policy Committee,

The purpose of the Center will be to research, develop, test, and expand innovative payment and delivery arrangements to improve the quality and reduce the cost of care provided to patients in each program. Dedicated funding is provided to allow for testing of models that require benefits not currently covered by Medicare. Successful models can be expanded nationally. [Thus appear better to fit the definition of “pilots”]

18 different models are listed for possible testing:

(i) Promoting broad payment and practice reform in primary care, including patient-centered medical home models for high-need individuals
(ii) Contracting directly with groups of providers of services and suppliers
(iii) Utilizing geriatric assessments and comprehensive care plans to coordinate the care of  individuals with multiple chronic conditions
(iv) Promote care coordination between providers of services and suppliers that transition health care providers away from fee-for-service based reimbursement and toward salary-based payment.
(v) Supporting care coordination for chronically ill  individuals at high risk of hospitalization through a health information technology-enabled provider network that includes care coordinators, a chronic disease registry, and home tele-health technology.
(vi) Varying payment to physicians who order advanced diagnostic imaging services
(vii) Utilizing medication therapy management services
(viii) Establishing community-based health teams to support small-practice medical homes
(ix) Assisting individuals in making informed health care choices by paying providers of services and suppliers for using patient decision-support tools
(x) Allowing States to test and evaluate fully integrating care for dual eligible individuals
(xi) Allowing States to test and evaluate systems of all-payer payment reform
(xii) Aligning nationally recognized, evidence based guidelines of cancer care with payment incentives
(xiii) Improving post-acute care through continuing care hospitals that offer inpatient rehabilitation, long-term care hospitals, and home health or skilled nursing care during an inpatient stay and the 30 days immediately following discharge
(xiv) Funding home health providers who offer chronic care management services to individuals
(xv) a collaborative of high-quality, low-cost health care institutions that is responsible for– best practices and proven care methods
(xvi) Facilitate inpatient care through the use of electronic monitoring by specialists based at integrated health systems
(xvii) Promoting efficiencies and access to outpatient services through models that do not require a physician or other health professional to refer the service
(xviii) Establishing comprehensive payments to Healthcare Innovation Zones, consisting of groups of providers

For more information about the Medicare CMI, see Medicare’s Opportunity to Encourage Innovation in Health Care Delivery, New England Journal of Medicine; March 3, 2010

Again, this blog post is simply intended to share findings about the sheer number and complexity of pilots and demos in the PPACA. I’ll be writing a lot more in future posts about specific projects and innovation  opportunities in Medicare.

 

APPENDIX — A Listing of Pilot & Demonstration Projects in the PPACA (abstracted from Senate Democratic Policy Committee, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as Passed, Section by Section Analysis, March 2010)

Pilots

Sec. 3023. National pilot program on payment bundling
Sec. 3504. Design and implementation of regionalized systems for emergency care
Sec. 4202. Healthy aging, living well; evaluation of community-based prevention and wellness programs for Medicare beneficiaries
Sec. 4206. Demonstration project concerning individualized wellness plan
Sec. 10326. Pilot testing pay-for-performance programs for certain Medicare providers

Demonstrations

Sec. 2705. Prohibiting discrimination against individual participants and beneficiaries based on health status
Sec. 2403. Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration
Sec. 2601. 5-year period for demonstration projects. (for dual eligible beneficiaries)
Sec. 2704. Demonstration project to evaluate integrated care around a hospitalization
Sec. 2705. Medicaid global payment system demonstration project
Sec. 2706. Pediatric Accountable Care Organization demonstration project
Sec. 2707. Medicaid emergency psychiatric demonstration project
Sec. 3024. Independence at home demonstration program
Sec. 3027. Extension of gainsharing demonstration
Sec. 3113. Treatment of certain complex diagnostic laboratory tests
Sec. 3123. Extension of the Rural Community Hospital Demonstration Program
Sec. 3126. Improvements to the demonstration project on community health integration models in certain rural counties
Sec. 3131. Payment adjustments for home health care
Sec. 3140. Medicare hospice concurrent care demonstration program
Sec. 3208. Making senior housing facility demonstration permanent
Sec. 3508. Demonstration program to integrate quality improvement and patient safety training into clinical education of health professionals
Sec. 3510. Patient navigator program
Sec. 4102. Oral healthcare prevention activities
Sec. 4204. Immunizations
Sec. 4206. Demonstration project concerning individualized wellness plan
Sec. 4306. Funding for childhood obesity demonstration project
Sec. 5304. Alternative dental health care provider demonstration project
Sec. 5317. Demonstration grants for family nurse practitioner training programs
Sec. 5507. Demonstration project to address health professions workforce needs; extension of family-to-family health information centers
Sec. 5509. Graduate nurse education demonstration program
Sec. 6112. National independent monitor demonstration project
Sec. 6114. National demonstration projects on culture change and use of information technology in nursing homes
Sec. 6801. Sense of the Senate regarding medical malpractice
Sec. 10504. Demonstration project to provide access to affordable care
Sec. 10607. State demonstration programs to evaluate alternatives to current medical tort litigation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. Feel free to republish this post with attribution.

18 Comments

  1. David de Bhal on March 29, 2010 at 4:31 am

    the paradigm shift is to the patient-controlled record. It is exactly the same paradigm shift that occurred when telephones became something that belonged to a person than to a place. Thank God for the Internet.

    David de Bhal



  2. David K Ahern on March 29, 2010 at 6:58 am

    RT @PaulTarini: Vince Kuraitis provides convenient list of pilots and demos in health reform legislation: http://bit.ly/bEHOTe



  3. Elizabeth Dickson on March 29, 2010 at 7:06 am

    RT @PaulTarini: Vince Kuraitis provides convenient list of pilots and demos in health reform legislation: http://bit.ly/bEHOTe



  4. Adam Coyne on March 29, 2010 at 7:29 am

    Nice resource. RT @PaulTarini: Vince Kuraitis's convenient list of pilots and demos in health reform legislation: http://bit.ly/bEHOTe #hcr



  5. KentBottles on March 29, 2010 at 8:56 am

    RT @PaulTarini: Vince Kuraitis provides convenient list of pilots and demos in health reform legislation: http://bit.ly/bEHOTe



  6. Vince Kuraitis on March 29, 2010 at 9:15 am

    Pilots, Demonstrations & Innovation in the PPACA #HealthcareReform Legislation. http://bit.ly/bgi9pQ #hcr #HealthIT



  7. Vince Kuraitis on March 29, 2010 at 6:04 pm

    Pilots, Demonstrations & Innovation in the PPACA #hcr Legislation. http://bit.ly/bgi9pQ #MC20



  8. Steve Wilkins on March 31, 2010 at 10:29 am

    Vince,

    You deserve an award for having the patience to put this listing together. On behalf of all the “lurkers” outhere in cyber space – thank you!



  9. Stephen Wilkins on March 31, 2010 at 11:33 am

    Checkout excellent listing of Pilots & Demonstrations included in Healthcare Reform Legislation | e-CareManagement http://bit.ly/bos5v1



  10. Dave deBronkart on April 2, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    RT @Healthmessaging: Checkout excellent listing of Pilots & Demonstrations included in Healthcare Reform Legislation | e-CareManagement http://bit.ly/bos5v1



  11. Devon Devine, J.D. on April 4, 2010 at 10:09 pm

    Vince,

    Given that your readers are likely interested in how they may participate in some of the demos and projects, I thought I would suggest a way of sorting through the opportunities.

    Step 1: What types of entities are eligible project participants? If you aren’t eligible, go to step 2.

    Step 2: Will the project be administered in a manner that provides opportunities for subcontractors? If so, go to step 3.

    Step 3: Determine whether your organization is suited to be a subcontractor to an eligible entity.

    Here’s an example using Section 4206:

    Step 1 – Eligibility. The recipient of funds under Sec. 4206 must be a “community health center” funded under 42 U.S.C. 245b, which is found under “health center” at 42 U.S.C. 254b. To qualify, you must fit within one of the trendy categories of “health services” listed there, or certain exceptions. If you don’t qualify, go to Step 2.

    Step 2 – Administration. The Secretary of HHS will dole out grants for 4206 directly to the “community health center” that is “funded under 42 U.S.C. 245b.” The health center will likely have ties to state government because one of the two factors for determining criteria is comments received from state officials. Sec. 254(b)(3)(B). Under open government protocols followed these days by most states, you will be able to find out which wellness programs your state is endorsing doing by looking at the state department of health web site.

    Step 3 – Subcontracting Options. Section 4206 is a new program, so there aren’t any established entities with subcontracting processes to use as an example. But if you look at the pattern established with HITECH Act funds in California, for example, we aer just now getting through the public comment process of its operational plan for ARRA funds earmarked back in February 2009. Consulting firms have been facilitating the process and design of the solutions, and will likely continue to do so.



  12. Gregg Masters on April 8, 2010 at 9:56 am

    #healthcare transformers; must read!! via @VinceKuraitis >> http://bit.ly/bEHOTe Let's get to work! #healthreform #mc20 #aco #pcmh



  13. Becca Price on April 8, 2010 at 10:00 am

    #HCreform pilots & demos, oh my! Good stuff-follow the $$$. RT @2healthguru: via @VinceKuraitis http://bit.ly/bEHOTe



  14. Gregg Masters on April 8, 2010 at 9:13 am

    Vince: a brilliant and concise piece of work.

    So, lets get to work!

    http://boutiqueMed.com
    http://ACOalliance.com

    Thank you!



  15. Peter Sarfati on April 27, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    Thanks Vince for all your consolidation!

    I think BCBS Michigan has a sensible approach to reimbursement of PCMH; from public domain info – a 10% increase in E&M fees for primary care practices they designate as PCMH.

    I’ll be interested to see if CMS emulate this structure.



  16. Scott Geller, MS on May 3, 2010 at 9:09 am

    Hi Vince,

    What negative impact will this legislation have on long-term care, and specifically Assisted Living and CCRCs? Thank you.

    Scott Geller, MS



    • Vince Kuraitis on May 3, 2010 at 10:05 am

      Scott, Sorry, with 2,400 pages of text in the reform legislation your question is just too specific for me to be knowledgeable about. Anyone else? V



  17. Inderjit Prakash on May 11, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    Thanks. This is very useful.