e-CareManagement blog

Chronic Disease Management • Technology • Strategy • Issues and Trends

Lifemasters Bankruptcy: Will CMS Earn Reputation as a Good Business Partner or Thug?

In my post from Monday on LifeMasters seeking Chapter 11, I dropped a BTW comment.

The part that’s puzzling to me is the statement that LifeMasters owes $125 M to CMS.  That’s hard to figure…the company only participated in MHS for a few months, and to my knowledge MHS is the only Medicare demo that required guaranteed savings (i.e., payback if targets aren’t hit).  

I really have to stretch my imagination to compute how CMS ran the tab to such an astronomical number. It raises questions around CMS’ good faith as a business “partner”.

Let’s do the math.

  • LifeMasters participated in MHS from 8/05 through 12/06 — 17 months.
  • Estimated monthly “fees” advanced by CMS — under $40 M   (20,000 patients x .90 participation rate x $130 per patient per month x 17 months — this is a high estimate)

How do you explain the difference between $125 M (amount supposedly owed) and $40 M (estimated actual payments to LifeMasters)?

  • CMS claims LifeMasters can’t get out of the contract?
  • CMS not flexible on full 3 year comparison of intervention vs. control group?
  • CMS still insists on 5% savings from LifeMasters?  (even though it later allowed other MHSOs to back off to break even vs. 5% savings?
  • something else?

So how could LifeMasters wind up owing CMS $125 Million!!!???

The title of this series of blog posts has been “CMS Bumps Off Medicare Health Support”.  I think that’s the right imagery. 

Mr. O, CMS seems to be a good place to start with your campaign to reform government and make it transparent.

 

Updated: 3:30 PM, 9/17/09

A colleague called and politely tapped me on the shoulder about my back-of-the-envelope calculations about how LifeMasters owes $125M to CMS.

LifeMasters had 3 separate contracts with CMS; my math only accounted for LifeMasters Oklahoma Medicare Health Support (MHS) project.

While I wish that my colleague would have felt comfortable posting a comment on the blog or to the broader DM listserv, I understand there are many sensitivities involved. 

So, I stand corrected on my math.  My concerns about lack of transparency around MHS remain.

Related Posts (# comments)

Tags: ,
 

Discussion

What do you think? Leave a comment. Alternatively, write a post on your own weblog; this blog accepts trackbacks. Your "first time" comment will not appear until approved by the moderator.

Subscribe without commenting

Mentions on other sites...

  1. Blackford Middleton on September 22nd, 2009 at 5:26 am

Leave a Reply