Subscribe if you want to be notified of new blog posts. You will receive an email confirming your subscription.

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.

Please check the captcha to verify you are not a robot.

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.

Hope for Primary Care … from a Payer? A White Paper on the Collaborative Payer Model

by Tom Doerr, MD and Randy Bak, MD, JD

What if the health care payer were re-imagined as a service to the primary care doctor – supplying the tools, information and funding primary care physicians needed to meet the call to reform health delivery?

The structure of physician payment is considered one of the most problematic aspects of our health care system.  Driven by volume instead of coordinated, proactive care and favoring procedures over cognitive work, the payment system has driven primary care into decline and stifled improvements in quality and efficiency.  Indeed, primary care physicians are overstressed and demoralized by demands, coming from every direction, that drive them only to see more patients, as quickly as possible.   In this state, primary care cannot attract new physicians at a time when an expansion of the primary care workforce is desperately needed.  Without new primary care doctors, how will medicine meet the future volume demands of the aging “baby boomers”, much less deliver the kind of comprehensive approach to patient health needed to correct the defects in today’s care?  Despite these growing concerns, little in the way of innovation is arising from payers.

So, what if the payer model was re-imagined?  What would such a payer look like?  At ESSENCE Healthcare, we have developed the Collaborative Payer Model (CPM), which takes the first steps at answering these questions. 

The CPM brings a new approach to address what is missing in much of health care reform, including:

  • Use of funding and information to preserve capitation’s benefits while mitigating its risks and concerns.
  • Giving the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and Congress a repaired use of risk-adjustment in Medicare Advantage, collaboration by payer and physicians, promotion of primary care and better management of supply sensitive-care.
  • Offering patients better access and more time with PCPs, earlier attention to health problems, and affordability.
  • Providing medical leadership transparency of premiums flow, access to rich administrative information, flexible and rational innovation planning and support for organizational development.
  • Equipping primary care providers (PCP) with the information, tools, support and compensation needed to deliver coordinated, comprehensive and effective care.
  • Providing other health service providers the opportunity to focus on value creation by collaborating with PCPs within their own community, instead of at a remote corporate or agency headquarters.

We have put the CPM into practice in all five of our service area states.  Thus far, it has performed well in patient benefits, shown best by maximum-out-of-pocket expenses (MOOP); in patient satisfaction as demonstrated by the CAHPS survey; and in HEDIS measures of performance

We believe the CPM is an innovative, dynamic partnership between a payer and a medical organization, built on aligned incentives, shared control, transparency and heightened reciprocal accountability.  The re-aligned funding serves to reinvigorate primary care, allowing time and resources to provide for coordinated, comprehensive and proactive care.  We hope by promoting the CPM model, CMS and Congress can advance the promise of risk-adjusted global payment lost in the initial implementation of Medicare Advantage.  For a detailed description of the CPM, please click here.

Tom Doerr is an internist in St. Louis, and a founder of ESSENCE Healthcare, a merger of a physician-founded Medicare Advantage health plan with a health information technology company.  He is currently chairman of the executive committee of the board, and an active evangelist for the Collaborative Payer Model.

Randy Bak is a pediatrician, attorney and former CIO of a 70 doctor primary care practice.  He is Director, Medical Affairs, for Essence Healthcare and is responsible for strategic policy development and bringing practice administration perspective to the health plan leadership. 

Contact the authors through CollaborativePayer@gmail.com.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. Feel free to republish this post with attribution.

6 Comments

  1. arthurwlane on May 8, 2009 at 9:21 am

    Hope for Primary Care … from a Payer? A White Paper on the Collaborative Payer Model http://bit.ly/C0qtV



  2. Suzanne Dewey on May 8, 2009 at 9:36 am

    RT @arthurwlane: Hope for Primary Care … from a Payer? A White Paper on the Collaborative Payer Model http://bit.ly/C0qtV



  3. Warren Todd on May 9, 2009 at 10:03 pm

    CPM? Sound very similar to the physician capitation initative in California in the mid-late 90’s. It was a disaster. The docs did not have the capability to manage costs. They lost their shirts.



  4. Randy Bak on May 11, 2009 at 6:55 am

    Warren-
    You make an important point.
    This effort is a reaction to exactly that experience–failed capitation of the 1990’s. Plans put all the risk on the physician groups in hide-the-ball finance arrangements. The CPM is different in some key ways:
    –physician groups are given complete visibility into the flow of funds from their source. It is what it is.
    –the administrative data stream of care delivery is given to the physician groups as quickly as it arrives in plan systems. Moreover, wherever possible, it is analyzed and prepared for presentation to the line clinicians, to help manage patient care and be stewards of that funding.
    –this new kind of payer uses its economies of scale to offer technology tools in clinical care and practice management.
    –it uses these economies of scale to develop clinical guidance free of bias introduced by pharma or PBM back-end deals. If their is a bias, it is toward care that makes sense for the line clinician.
    –this scale also creates a community of physician organizations operating under similar circumstances. The plan facilitates sharing among these groups.

    Information asymmetry and fragmentation of care delivery have been used by intermediaries to exploit the massive flow of funds from society to those who need health care. This practice has been executed so thoroughly that it is unclear whether current practitioners can change. Physician groups have been driven into near learned helplessness.

    Re-aligning participants and their contracts (nothing misty and utopian here) around payment and information that drive better care is the secret sauce.

    “Capitation of the ’90’s” is exactly what the CPM abhors. If the paper doesn’t make that clear, please help us do a better job of making that clear.
    rb



  5. Rachel Clarkson on May 28, 2009 at 10:02 am

    I agree with Warren, this needs to be deeply considered. Thanks for the post



  6. Alister Lane MD on July 14, 2009 at 12:40 am

    Thanks for the interesting post, it provides a lot to think about for everyone involved. As long as physician groups are given complete visibility into the flow of funds from their source then at least this gives them control and they can make good judgements based on this.